Monday, September 24, 2007

Krauts on the March Again


From time to time, I've commented on the Krauts. My problem isn't necessarily with the individual Teuton, but rather when you mix them with government. Clearly, we need to separate Kraut and State.

What I say we need to do is follow Patton's advice and start a war with them. We have a pretty damn good record of exporting democracy - except when it comes to the Germs. I must have lost track of the news - when did the occupation end? Cripes, it could only have been a couple years ago, and look what's happened? The problem is the "cut and run" crowd. We never finished the job in the Reich. I thought Ike told 'em to de-Nazify the place.

Well, it goes to show you that this never happened.

First of all, they're throwing Baptists in jail and taking their kids away for homeschooling them. Look, I'm no fan of the Anabaptist, and I wouldn't argue against holding them under a little longer, but throwing them in jail and seizing their offspring is right out of the Buchenwald playbook. Some things never change. I guess people would have to start locking their doors at night if they let these violent Baptists educate their kids. Perfectly understandable - if you're a square head.

Then they got a Lutheran pastor serving a year for being against abortion. Yeah, good thing this "dangerous thug" is "off the streets."

Then check out this Barbarian bimbette's idea of what the goose-stepping government should be doing! And this broad is considered a "conservative." If I want to stay miserably married for decades, it is no business of the Hessian bureaucrats. Who won Dubya-Dubya-Eye-Eye anyhow?

Finally, check out this little Nazi proposal. Now I know why CPH won't let pastors put 1500 year old "copyrighted" collects on their webpages: Kraut in the blood. Control freaks.

The Blitzkrieg rolls on.

7 comments:

  1. Help Create Democracy 2.0

    Week Released: September 17-21, 2007

    The Millennial Generation, including myself, is interested in being an
    active part of changing public policy. This interest led me to be a part of
    Mobilize.org¹s Democracy 2.0 Campaign.

    On July 4, Mobilize.org began the Democracy 2.0 project to call attention to
    the ways that our democratic process and institutions are properly serving
    and failing to serve the interests of Americans, specifically young
    Americans. The purpose of Democracy 2.0 is to call attention to the main
    problems of our current political system, highlight the distinct
    characteristics of the Millennial Generation, and provide guidelines for
    change to help cultivate a renewed political process in America.

    Currently, our political system is trying to manage a 21st century society
    with 18th century political institutions. Democracy 2.0 will upgrade our
    current political system, empowering citizens to identify community
    problems, propose solutions, be a part of the implementation of these
    solutions, and change the way politics is done in this country.

    To begin this endeavor, Mobilize.org asked a series of questions and
    collected data from youth, ages 16-30 that will be reviewed and evaluated by
    Democracy 2.0 Ambassadors at the Democracy 2.0 Summit on October 3, 2007,
    with the intention of releasing the Democracy 2.0 Declaration of Our
    Generation. The Declaration of our Generation is a short statement of
    principles describing a citizen-centered approach to democracy. The
    Declaration will focus on three themes: 1) What currently works and what
    does not work in our democracy; 2) What defines our generation; and 3) What
    Democracy 2.0 should look like.

    The Declaration will call attention to areas in which the government is
    succeeding and failing to serve the public interest, highlight the unique
    and defining characteristics of our generation, and provide guidelines that
    will serve as a call to action for American citizens to help create this
    renewed form of democracy.

    I wanted to mention this opportunity since every posting here has an
    interest in this. Mobilize.org is looking for people who want to serve as
    Democracy 2.0 Online Ambassadors to be a part of the drafting process. If
    you have any questions, please shoot me an e-mail at brendan.chan@mail.utexas.edu.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Up is Down. And Down is Up.

    Christians are now part of the evil fundamental fringes that the secular humanist centrists so fear.

    So if we don't toe-the-narrow-line and march lock-step with the centrists, the centrists start taking away our kids and locking our pastors in jail.

    Who are the Nazis again?

    ReplyDelete
  3. General, I don't know any other way to contact you but look at the latest McCain and company sales pitch. http://www.cph.org/cphstore/pages/resources/cafesola/

    ReplyDelete
  4. Chan:

    You sound like a Chi-Com to me, kid. Get off my lawn unless you have a rickshaw cart and a kung pao chicken under that straw hat.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lawrence:

    I think we dropped the bombs on the wrong country.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Xtorim:

    I saw the coffee ad, and plan to comment on it when I get less sober.

    Down the hatch!

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Currently, our political system is trying to manage a 21st century society with 18th century political institutions."

    You mean that representative democracy in the form of a federal republic shareing powers between judicil, legislative, and executive branches. And allows individual states to jidicial, legislate, and execute their own specific laws isn't good enough. And allows unalienable civil rights as well as individual property ownership rights?

    How does one improve on this level of fairness in the political process?

    ReplyDelete